Food stamps to be used for hot food at some restaurants

State lawmakers have advanced a bill that would allow food stamp recipients to use their benefits at certain restaurants.

Courtesy of Virginia Mercury

The General Assembly passed a package of legislation this week to loosen restrictions on food and cash assistance programs for the poor.

One bill repeals a “child cap” aimed at discouraging women receiving welfare from having additional children after they’ve enrolled, which the NAACP opposed when it passed in 1995 and advocates call plainly discriminatory.

Another will allow disabled, homeless and elderly food stamp recipients to use their benefits to purchase hot meals in restaurants.

A third will end a ban on cash and food assistance for people convicted of felony drug charges.

The bill addressing felons easily drew the most debate, with Republicans arguing convicted drug dealers should not be eligible for public assistance and Democrats arguing the law punishes children for their parents’ crimes.

“Statistically, most drug convictions are from low income households and thus are unable to reenter society without (assistance),” said Sen. Mamie Locke, D-2nd, of Hampton, who proposed the legislation in the Senate. Without help, she said offenders are more likely to commit additional crimes “which costs more money to imprison them than the cost of benefits.”

Under current law, people convicted of felony distribution or manufacture of drugs are ineligible, and people convicted of felony possession are only eligible if they comply with court orders, complete a substance abuse program and participate in periodic drug screenings. 

If a parent is ineligible, their children are also denied benefits.

According to the Department of Social Services, 1,891 people last year were denied food assistance through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) or had their benefits terminated as a result of a drug conviction. 

The bill would also apply to cash assistance provided through the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program, for which 104 people were denied benefits for drug felonies last year.

The new rules would increase the cost of administering SNAP and TANF benefits $550,000 in state and federal funds. Gov. Ralph Northam (D) has endorsed the proposal, including funding for the bill in his proposed budget.

Sen. Jen Kiggans, R-7th, of Virginia Beach, told her colleagues on the Senate floor she worries that government assistance would make people less likely to attempt to turn their lives around. “I think it kills some of the motivation if we continue to just give people food stamps rather than allowing them the choice to go out and perhaps work, earn a living and make things better for themselves,” she said.

Democrats called the argument absurd. “In terms of removing motivation for getting a job, it’s really hard to believe that a family receiving TANF benefits would want to live on slightly less than $400 a month — that’s the average monthly payment for a family of three, usually a mother and two children,” said Sen. Barbara Favola, D-31st, of Arlington. “This is a hand up when an individual needs it most. These are not programs individuals stay on for an extended period of time.”

The bill passed the House on a party-line vote and cleared the Senate 22-18, with Sen. Siobhan Dunnavant, R-12th, of Henrico, voting with Democrats.

Repealing the ‘child cap’

A bill to eliminate the child cap for TANF benefits was significantly less controversial, drawing two dissenting votes between the House and the Senate. It denies additional benefits to mothers who have additional children while enrolled in the program.

“This prohibition has long been a discriminatory policy and is based on the assumption that poor families have additional children in order to qualify for higher TANF benefits,” said Del. Lashrecse Aird, D-63rd, of Petersburg, who proposed the legislation.

In Virginia, there are currently 737 children who are ineligible for benefits of approximately $79 a month under the rule, according to state officials.

The General Assembly passed the legislation in 1995 as part of a broader overhaul of the state’s welfare programs that introduced the concept of “workfare.” Then Sen. Mark Earley, a Republican from Hampton Roads, argued that it was an appropriate restriction to impose on someone who “comes to the state for help because she can’t take care of the children she has,” according to Richmond Times-Dispatch coverage at the time. 

A coalition that included the NAACP, the Virginia Poverty Law Center and the Catholic Diocese of Richmond assailed the overall proposal as “harsh, reckless and anti-family.”

About half of states implemented similar policies in the 1990s but at least eight have since repealed those policies, according to Pew Charitable Trusts’ Stateline.

Dining out with food stamps

Danica Roem 2019 mug

Del. Danica Roem, D-13th

States have also been reevaluating their policies on what kinds of foods SNAP recipients can use their benefits to purchase.

Arizona, California and Rhode Island are among a handful of states to recently pass laws establishing a restaurant meals program for elderly, homeless and disabled residents. Currently, food stamp recipients can’t purchase cooked or prepared foods. (Ever noticed those “No EBT” signs on the nacho machine at 7-Eleven?)

Virginia would join those states under legislation proposed by Del. Danica Roem, D-13th, of Prince William, and passed this week by the House and the Senate. The new program would not cost the state any money because total benefits remain the same. Participation by restaurants would be optional.

As the bill made its way through the General Assembly, Roem used the example of a homeless person with no place to cook or store their belongings being unable to purchase a hoagie at Wawa or an MTO at Sheetz.

“Right now you can get a cold sandwich or a bag of chips,” she said. “But you can’t get a hot sub. Get the hot sub. Go get yourself fed. I’m an Italian stepmom. I want to feed everybody. Go eat.”

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.

Recommended for you

(9) comments


Why shouldnt ppl with drug felons get food stamps because the government sure dont care to give them to convicted child molesters which is wrong in every way..


Bettet idea: stop all public 'assistance' for any adult capable of working at any job. Why live on income gathered through extortion?


Why would we deny food to anyone? That makes no sense. I am tired of the bible thumpers being the meanest kid on the block.

Tom Fitzpatrick

Excuse me.

I want to understand.

Are you saying that every person should get any and all food they want, from whatever source that they choose, at the expense of their neighbors?


Firestorm it's not being mean be disincentivizing the growth of welfare. It's actually an encouragement to get a job, schooling to better oneself in the job world. I understand that democrats want more suckers and dependent people on the dole voting for them. It's self evident with the candidates running for President in the democrat party.


no reason for this other than to drum up more democrat voters who want free stuff...all at the expense of the american tax payer.


These. Democrats are nuts. Then again they need voters. They don't care.

Donald Stanton

see this is wrong with white peoples they want to be the only one's that's get welfare for years .now that virginia is trying to make this a equal county y'all people are rasict i see why virginia is the first state of slaves.


Virginia has been equal for a long while. Come off the Democrat plantation Donald.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.