You have permission to edit this article.

Va. Redistricting Commission votes to allow use of political data, reject university map-drawers

  • Updated
  • 1

 The Virginia Capitol at sunrise

The most revealing moment of the Virginia Redistricting Commission’s meeting Tuesday may have come during a bathroom break.

With microphones still on and broadcasting to a live stream, Sen. George Barker, D-Fairfax, huddled with Democratic citizen commissioner Brandon Hutchins, who seemed concerned the commission was setting itself up for public blowback by not living up to its promise of a fairer redistricting process.

“They are going to bomb us for this,” Hutchins said.

“Actually, they won’t,” said Barker. “It’s actually a fairly small segment of the public that is working on this issue. … There’ll be some complaints here and there. There always are.”

Time will tell whose prediction is correct. But a series of decisions the commission made Tuesday offer the clearest picture yet of the role politics will continue to play in a process formerly handled entirely by legislators in the General Assembly who were effectively empowered to draw their own districts.

In a divided vote, the 16-member commission, made up of eight legislators and eight citizens, chose to allow political data and incumbents’ home addresses to be considered throughout the map-drawing process. Supporters said that would allow the commission to spot and correct potential problems with minority representation or undue partisan leanings. Critics said it would feed the perception districts are being “rigged” to achieve a particular outcome.

On a party-line vote, the commission deadlocked on a proposal to hire a team of geographic data specialists from the University of Richmond who would have assisted the commission with the technical side of drawing maps. Commissioners, who had already decided to hire both Republican and Democratic attorneys as legal counsel, got conflicting advice from the lawyers on whether turning to academia was a good idea. A Democratic lawyer said he saw no problem with it, but Republican attorneys said the UR group lacked redistricting experience and could be perceived as biased.

It was unclear how the commission would proceed with hiring outside map-drawing help, but one possibility is the partisan lawyers will select their own partisan map-drawers. The question of whether those two partisan teams would be creating their own maps or working together on a single proposal was left unresolved.

“We just made our lives a lot more complicated,” said Democrat Greta Harris, a commission co-chair who said the UR group’s geographic information systems skills would translate to redistricting even though the team hadn’t done it before.

Republican commissioners said the lawyers had been asked to try to reach a bipartisan consensus on experienced map-drawers. Because they weren’t successful, they said, they couldn’t support the hire.

Republican commissioner Richard Harrell used an analogy from his trucking business to explain his reasoning, saying he wouldn’t ask an inexperienced driver to haul hazardous chemicals.

“Because he’s got to be trained. And it’s dangerous,” Harrell said.

A similar partisan split emerged when the commission decided whether it should form eight-person subcommittees to work on House of Delegates and Senate maps before taking them to the full commission.

The group’s bipartisan co-chairs had proposed equalized subcommittees with both parties, both citizens and legislators, and legislators from both chambers serving on each subcommittee. Some commissioners, particularly Sen. Steve Newman, R-Lynchburg, argued all senators should serve on the Senate subcommittee and all House members should serve on the House subcommittee. That approach, he said, would help the commission produce maps capable of passing the two chambers when they go to the General Assembly for an up-or-down vote.

Republican commissioner Virginia Trost-Thornton concurred.

“When I’m seeking medical expertise I go to a medical expert,” Trost-Thornton said. “If I’m on the House committee, I would be seeking House members’ expertise in trying to draw their lines.”

Citizens looking to legislators for guidance on what to do, said Democratic commissioner James Abrenio, defeats the purpose of a citizen-led commission.

“I don’t think the public wanted us to just defer to the legislators,” he said.

Mackenzie Babichenko, the commission’s Republican co-chair who helped craft the subcommittee proposal, voted with the body’s Democrats in an unsuccessful effort to have subcommittees with mixed representation from the two chambers. The only purpose, she said, was to “divide up the work.”

“In no way were these groups meant to supplant the will and the wishes of the full commission,” Babichenko said.

The failed vote means there will be no subcommittees.

“I hope everybody likes being in Richmond,” Harris said.

The commission has not yet begun drawing maps, but the body is planning to meet on a weekly basis going forward.

Under its timeline, new legislative maps are due Oct. 10. New congressional maps are due Oct. 25.

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.

2020 was a year marked by hardships and challenges, but the Prince William community has proven resilient. The Prince William Times is honored to serve as your community companion. To say thank you for your continued support, we’d like to offer all our subscribers -- new or returning --


We understand the importance of working to keep our community strong and connected. As we move forward together into 2021, it will take commitment, communication, creativity, and a strong connection with those who are most affected by the stories we cover.

We are dedicated to providing the reliable, local journalism you have come to expect. We are committed to serving you with renewed energy and growing resources. Let the Prince William Times be your community companion throughout 2021, and for many years to come.


Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(1) comment


The whole point of this commission was so the politicians did not draw the lines around their home address. The voters are suppose to pick their representatives not the Politicians pick their voters. There should be zero concern about home addresses of current law makers.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Page Title

The future of Prince William Times now depends on community support. Your donation will help us continue to improve our journalism through in-depth local news coverage and expanded reader engagement.

Keeping you connected to the Community. Find or Submit your local event here..

Sign Up For Newsletters