You have permission to edit this article.

Trade unions back massive ‘rural crescent’ data center plan

Union heads say the projects would generate construction jobs for years

  • Updated
  • 3

Prince William is among the counties with the largest concentration of data centers in the commonwealth. The huge, windowless, box-shaped buildings house computer systems critical for running the internet. Several have been constructed on Va. 234.

A coalition of dozens of regional construction and labor unions are backing plans for a controversial, 800-acre data center campus known as the “PW Digital Gateway” proposed for rural, western Prince William County, further ramping up political pressure behind the project’s approval.  

The Northern Virginia Labor Federation and the Baltimore-D.C. Building and Construction Trades Council, who together represent more than 50,000 construction and building trades workers in the D.C. metro region, have thrown their support behind the plan, citing high wages and steady employment opportunities for their workers. It is not uncommon for labor organizations to endorse a single development plan, but neither organization has publicly backed a data center project in Prince William County until now.  

The PW Digital Gateway could create up to 21 million square feet of data center space, making it the largest potential string of data centers Prince William County. The build-out of such facilities would likely take more than a decade, generating hundreds if not thousands of new construction jobs. 


An 800-acre data center campus, dubbed the "PWC Digital Gateway," is under discussion for a string of properties in Prince William County's "rural crescent" on land bordering the Manassas National Battlefield Park.

“For this steady stream of data centers to be popping up in the region, that's really significant and is a huge stabilizing force for construction workers in the area,” said Greg Akerman, Northern Virginia director for the Baltimore-D.C. Building and Construction Trades Council, about the digital gateway proposal.  

Council President Stephen Courtien said the organization has not publicly backed Northern Virginia data center developments in the past but that opposition from conservation groups and others prompted them to make their support for the digital gateway proposal more public. 

“The reason we haven't had to publicly support others is there wasn't pushback,” he said.  

Virginia Diamond, executive director for the Northern Virginia Labor Federation, said the proposal would provide county residents with opportunities “to get good jobs in the building trades” and for “residents from underserved communities to get into good apprenticeship programs” in a rapidly expanding industry. 

“This type of development can really help the community,” Diamond said. 

Diamond and Courtien both said they do not have estimates for the number of construction and trade jobs the digital gateway could create but agreed it would likely be in the thousands. 

Data center industry expanding in Prince William  

In the last decade, Prince William County has become a major hub for data centers. The huge, windowless, box-shaped buildings house computer systems and servers critical for running the internet. They use large amounts of electricity and are often sited along major electrical transmission lines. As demand for data center space rose during the pandemic, the industry drove up land prices in the county with some larger parcels recently selling to data center developers for close to $1 million an acre. 

The digital gateway is controversial because it is the first string of data center campuses proposed for the county’s “rural crescent,” a 117,000-acre area along the western edge of the county where residential development is limited and industrial development is generally not allowed.  

The plan could reshape at least 800 acres of mostly undeveloped agricultural land along Pageland Lane that partially borders Manassas National Battlefield Park and Conway Robinson State Forest, off U.S. 29. Its proposal has been extremely contentious since it was first announced in March. It’s drawn unanimous backlash from local conservation groups and Republican county supervisors, while some Democratic supervisors have signaled their support because of its potential to generate tens of millions in local tax revenue.  

There’s also the possibility the 800-acre proposal could expand in size once approved by the county board. In July, the Prince William Board of County Supervisors voted along party lines to examine the entire Pageland Lane corridor for data center uses, an area that spans nearly 5 miles. Any such development would transform the existing pastoral landscape.  

Union support splits supervisors 

The gateway’s endorsement by regional labor unions will likely step up the pressure on the Democratic supervisors, who hold a 5-3 majority on the county board, to approve the project. All five Democratic supervisors received campaign contributions ranging from $500 to $10,000 from those organizations during the 2019 election, and all five of their votes will likely be needed for the project’s approval because the board’s three Republicans say they oppose it. 

So far, only one supervisor, Victor Angry, D-Neabsco, has explicitly stated his support for the plan. In a recent interview, Angry said he welcomed union support, saying the gateway development would create “take-care-of-the-family” jobs for Prince William County workers. He also pushed back on criticism that data centers create few long-term jobs.  

“Everyone talks about how data centers don't create jobs. It may not have jobs at the end of it, but what it creates is job opportunities for small businesses and contractors,” Angry said.  

Supervisor Kenny Boddye, D-Occoquan, did not directly answer questions about his support for project. Boddye said in an email that, "While I am proud to have the support of working people and their representatives, I decide each case on its own merits and in its final form once it is before the board.” 

Board Chair Ann Wheeler and Supervisors Andrea Bailey, D-Potomac, and Margaret Franklin, D-Woodbridge, did not respond to emailed requests for comment.  

Supervisor Pete Candland, R-Gainesville, who once said he would fight any data center development in the county’s rural area “tooth and nail,” was more reserved in his response to questions about the plan last week, signaling that his position could be softening. 

“Land use decisions have long-lasting impacts that go well beyond any one special interest. Proposals such as PW Digital Gateway have to be considered with input from many different entities and not for the benefit of any one group,” Candland said.  

Supervisor Jeanine Lawson, R-Brentsville, however, said she would continue to stand with residents, historic preservation and environmentalist groups and national park advocates in opposition. Lawson is vying for the Republican nomination for Congress in Virginia’s 10th District.  

“Union politics should be absolutely irrelevant to any land use decisions made by the board, although it's a sign some board members are desperate to drum up support for PW Digital Gateway,” Lawson said in an email. 

Conservation groups opposed  

The debate over data center growth in the county has largely revolved around where they should be placed. The Prince William County Department of Economic Development has said the county’s existing “Data Center Opportunity Zone,” a nearly 10,000-acre area where data centers are allowed by-right, has nearly run out of available land for data center development.  

Christina Winn, executive director of the Prince William Department of Economic Development, said in a July 30 letter to the planning department that only 90 to 830 “developable greenfield acres remain within” the data center overlay district. 

Kim Hosen, executive director of Prince William Conservation Alliance at data center presser

“We are wondering why the unions are supporting a controversial project for data centers that are adjacent to a national park, within the watershed for our public drinking and in the rural crescent, as opposed to data centers that are in our industrial area, where the impacts are significantly less,” said Kim Hosen, executive director of the Prince William Conservation Alliance. 

Those estimates have been disputed by some environmental and conservation groups. The Piedmont Environmental Council conducted its own analysis of the data center district and found at least 3,100 acres remaining in the district that could be suitable for data centers, according to Julie Bolthouse, the council’s deputy director of land use.  

new coalition of six local and regional environmental groups fighting the expansion of data centers in the county, including Piedmont Environmental Council, the Prince William Conservation Alliance and the National Parks Conservation Alliance, also questioned organized labor’s support for the project in a recent email.  

“We are wondering why the unions are supporting a controversial project for data centers that are adjacent to a national park, within the watershed for our public drinking and in the rural crescent, as opposed to data centers that are in our industrial area, where the impacts are significantly less,” said Kim Hosen, executive director of the Prince William Conservation Alliance. 

Reach Daniel Berti at  

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.

2020 was a year marked by hardships and challenges, but the Prince William community has proven resilient. The Prince William Times is honored to serve as your community companion. To say thank you for your continued support, we’d like to offer all our subscribers -- new or returning --


We understand the importance of working to keep our community strong and connected. As we move forward together into 2021, it will take commitment, communication, creativity, and a strong connection with those who are most affected by the stories we cover.

We are dedicated to providing the reliable, local journalism you have come to expect. We are committed to serving you with renewed energy and growing resources. Let the Prince William Times be your community companion throughout 2021, and for many years to come.


Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(3) comments

Tom Fitzpatrick

Those in Western PWC have long used Eastern PWC taxpayers to generate the tax revenues to support Western PWC schools and other benefits to which they feel entitled, but have no desire to pay for, either fnancially, or in any way that encroaches on the "lifestyle."

The fact is, Eastern PWC has long been abused, used and robbed to fund those i Western PWC, and it is long past time that they be required to pull their own weight.

Are data centers the answer? Maybe. But, the right commercial development is.

I urge the media and the Eastern PWC Board Members to look closely at the net tax impact of each area - what each area generates, and what each area uses. I suspect that they will be surprised.

Oh, and those gerrymandered 10 acre plots out in Western PWC? Check those, too. Look at the artifically low appraised value of the land, which is then compounded by the fact that it is taxed at the agricultural rate.

I'm sick of it, and I'm sick of the failure of our representives in Eastern PWC to hold those in Western PWC to account.

Let's see an analysis and article on exactly what the impact, good and bad, of the data centers would be. Not subjective. Not emotional. But data driven facts.

I would think that a data center would have far less impact on water quality than virtually any other development. Traffic would be less than yet another subdivision or shopping center. Crime? No. School system demand? No.

Do your duty and tell us the facts.


But, but, but...where's all of PWC's climate change fanatics? Why aren't they crying out for this land to be used for solar panels and wind turbines? Crickets from the hypocrites.


Union jobs or apprenticeships is NOT the issue folks.

If you build these monstrous windows boxes which generate a lot of heat in industrial areas you still maintain the Union jobs, except putting in industrial areas or where these centers are already approved , will still produce jobs and still produce apprenticeships and ypu won't destroy the Crescent and you affect ground water..

So what's the real push here??

The BiCounty Parkway that 4 lane truck highway to bypass 95 to 66 to Dulles. Instead it would take trucks onto this new highway and create massive destruction for the people and their water their air and their quality of life.

I am of the opinion that this horrible Board has their minds made up and this delay is simply some study group charade.

They will approve it, they will approve the Parkway and they will destroy the area all for private donations to their retirement accounts.

To heck with the homeowner taxpayer!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Page Title

The future of Prince William Times now depends on community support. Your donation will help us continue to improve our journalism through in-depth local news coverage and expanded reader engagement.

Keeping you connected to the Community. Find or Submit your local event here..

Sign Up For Newsletters