Devlin Road Community aerial

The Prince William Board of County Supervisors  gave its blessing Tuesday, March 10, to the "Devlin Community," which plans 516 new homes in Bristow. 

The Prince William Board of County Supervisors voted early Wednesday to approve a rezoning allowing 516 new homes to be built near Devlin and Linton Hall roads in Bristow.

The board approved the rezoning in a 5-2 vote near the end of a marathon meeting that ended after 1 a.m.

All five Democratic supervisors voted in favor of the rezoning, while Supervisors Jeanine Lawson, R-Brentsville, and Peter Candland, R-Gainesville, voted against it. Supervisor Yesli Vega, R-Coles, abstained from voting on the rezoning approval. 

Prior to that vote, Lawson asked the board to vote to deny the rezoning. The board voted 3-5 along party lines with all three Republicanvoting to deny the rezoning, and all five Democrats voting in favor of the rezoning. 

It was the first major land-use case to come before the board since its five new members were elected last November.

The project, called "the Devlin Community," is proposed by developer Stanley Martin. It will add 516 single-family homes on 270 undeveloped acres within the county’s "development area," meaning it is outside the rural crescent. The average lot size for the new homes is between 7,100 and 7,800 square feet. The homes are expected to be priced at more than $600,000. 

The Prince William County Planning Commission recommended approval of the project in September 2018. Prince William County’s professional planning staff also recommended that supervisors approve the rezoning at Tuesday’s meeting.

Lawson voted against the rezoning over concerns about the impact the development will have on school overcrowding and traffic congestion in her district. 

“Students, commuters and teachers have been waiting for years for school and road improvements,” Lawson said. 

Lawson said she would be in favor of the project if Stanley Martin would reduce the number of planned homes, but the developer declined to do so. 

“I really would like to make this a win-win for everybody, but that doesn’t seem like something the applicant is willing to do,” Lawson said. 

The new development is the latest iteration of what once was called the “Stone Haven” project. That now-defunct development at one time proposed more than 1,800 homes on about 700 acres in the same area.

Lawson’s opposition to original Stone Haven project led to the landowners withdrawing their rezoning application in 2015.

Supervisor Victor Angry, D-Neabsco, said he is concerned about the potential for increased traffic congestion on Devlin Road, which already experiences heavy traffic during rush hour. But he ultimately voted to approve the project. 

“Regardless of what happens on that property, you’ve got bad traffic on that road,” Angry said. “If we have an opportunity to fix that road first, then I would definitely want to entertain that on this board.”

Peter Dolan, an attorney who represents Stanley Martin, said the development will begin construction in 2022 and will be completed by 2032. Dolan said additional roads and schools in the area will be completed before the full buildout in 2032.

Additionally, because the rezoning application was submitted prior to July 1, 2016, when the state’s new law limiting proffers went into effect, it offers a total of $27.7 million to the county to offset the impact of the new residents.

The proffer package includes $13 million for transportation improvements and $10.7 million for county schools. 

At-large Chair Ann Wheeler (D) voted in favor of the development. Wheeler said road improvements for Devlin Road could be completed before the full buildout in 2032. 

“I don’t see Devlin Road as a major issue,” Wheeler said.

Prince William County voters approved a road bond referendum in November 2019 that includes $50 million to widen Devlin Road. The money for construction of that project was not included in the proposed 2021 county budget, however. 

About 30 county residents came to the meeting to speak against the rezoning and the new homes that will accompany it. Most expressed concerns about school overcrowding and traffic congestion in the surrounding areas. A handful of residents spoke in favor of the proposal. 

John Zuck, a Brentsville resident, said he is concerned the new development will lead to more classroom trailers outside area schools. 

“The newest county high school already has five trailers. If you’re in favor of keeping trailers at schools, go ahead and approve it,” Zuck said. “I’m asking you to please vote no.”

David Geiger, a Brentsville resident who recently moved to the area, said school overcrowding is a major concern. Geiger said his children attend Prince William County schools. 

“The idea that we’re proposing 516 homes when there is already overcrowding in schools is discouraging,” Geiger said. 

Mansimran Singh Kahlon, a Brentsville resident and one of the county’s elected Soil and Water Conservation District directors, said the development would worsen traffic congestion. 

“We’re just talking about what’s best for our community,” Kahlon said. “Let’s just wait for the new traffic improvements are finished to see what we can do.”

Sameer Patel, the developer of the nearby Bristow Commons shopping center, spoke in favor of the new development. Patel said the added population would help fill vacancies in the shopping center. 

“We’ve had trouble leasing out our spaces,” Patel said. “You have to have houses to bring retailers ... Hopefully this is the next step to bring more people to the area.”

Reach Daniel Berti at dberti@fauquier.com

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.
0
0
0
1
0

Recommended for you

(4) comments

Firestorm

Who cares about the shopping center? No one. Why are we putting in $600k houses on postage stamp lots? 7,000 square foot lots are less than a quarter acre.

Little boxes on the hillside,

Little boxes made of ticky tacky

Little boxes on the hillside,

Little boxes all the same,

There's a pink one and a green one

And a blue one and a yellow one

And they're all made out of ticky tacky

And they all look just the same.

ESH

To Mr. Patel - You have every right to be in favor of the project just as much as everybody else there who was opposed to it. I will however note that this is essentially about making more money for you and for everyone else it was a quality of life issue. I surmise the lack of this development is not the reason for your troubles as there are plenty of houses close by. I have driven through and been a patron of dozens of shopping centers throughout my life and yours is one of the worst designed I have ever seen. Access is limited and difficult. Positioning of the stores is literally backwards. Parking is a game of don't hit the curbs and other random things placed where they shouldn't. To top it off, the place still looks like a half finished construction site. Now that the board has officially gone against the will of the people in approving this project, I hope you will take this opportunity to work with the developers and improve your shopping center to make your merchants and their customers lives easier. May I suggest bulldozing the entire thing and starting over from scratch?

ESH

PS - Thanks for the 10% increase in property taxes that's incoming, fellow Democrats. Glad I can contribute my share to the net loss this development will create for the tax base.

ESH

It wouldn't have mattered if 3000 residents came out to speak against this atrocity, the board knew they were approving it way before 1 am which is when this vote was taken. Here's the bottom line. The schools are overcrowded now and as soon as new ones are built they are at capacity. Traffic is bad now and we have 3 years of construction to look forward to very close to this development. However, nothing is guaranteed as of today to deal with the traffic in this development's immediate vicinity. People who live close to Devlin Road deal with water issues now and I don't trust the developers or the county to do what's right and go beyond "code" to ensure this development's drainage doesn't end up in one of my neighbor's yards or basements.

In summary, there are problems now, this development adds to the problems, and we only have pinky-swear promises that they will one day get solved. I was disgusted to watch this meeting, hear a majority of the board raise the same issues I've raised, and then immediately vote along party lines - and I say that as a Democrat. Deeply disappointed in my fellow party members that they sided with the developers instead of the people.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.