generic church.jpg

While most people go to church to worship, security expert Chernoh Wurie goes to worship and protect. He leads security at Hill City Church in the Richmond area.

A bill to allow weapons, including firearms, within places of worship died in the House last week. Senate Bill 1024, introduced by Sen. Richard Black, R-13th, passed the Senate along party lines, 21-19, but died in the House Rules Committee. Black represents part of Prince William County and part of Loudoun County. The bill sought to repeal a law on the books since the 1950s. 

“It’s chaos waiting to happen if you ask me,” Wurie said. “It gets a lot more problematic when you put guns in churches.” 

Hill City Church, a non-denominational Christian church off Staples Mill Road near the Richmond city line, has a strict no-firearms policy, with signs up throughout the building. The only people allowed to carry a weapon are Wurie and his security team, picked, he said, because of their police training. 

Wurie said places of worship without an organized security team might be more likely to allow congregation members to carry because “there is no other form of protection.”

Gun violence has occurred at places of worship in the recent past. 

  • In October, 11 people were killed and seven injured in a mass shooting at the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 
  • In November 2017, 26 people were killed and about 20 injured in a mass shooting at the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas. 
  • In January 2017, a mass shooting at the Islamic Cultural Centre of Quebec City left six dead and 17 injured. 

Some said the number of casualties in Texas would have been higher if a civilian hadn’t fired at the shooter. But other groups feel uncomfortable with firearms in a place of worship. 

The Virginia Interfaith Center for Public Policy is a coalition of more than 700 faith groups. The organization opposed SB 1024 and urged members to contact legislators, saying that worship spaces should “be holy, safe and a refuge” and “free of violence.”

Wurie said he thinks some places would allow their congregation to carry firearms, and it is ultimately the institution’s decision. 

He said if the bill had passed, he would have anticipated institutions potentially hiring congregation members with security experience.  

“It can be a distraction, to a point, for both security and the congregation,” Wurie said. “If everyone is allowed to carry arms during worship, it could be a distraction for the people.” 

If the bill had passed the House, Imad Damaj, faculty adviser for the Muslim Student Association at Virginia Commonwealth University, said they planned to lobby the governor to veto it and that the organization did not think the bill would make anyone safer.

“We spoke against it; a lot of people in the Muslim community spoke against it,” Damaj said. “Accidents can happen. You come to a place of worship for peace, prayer and inspiration.” 

Damaj worships at the Islamic Center of Virginia. He also said weapons would be a distraction to the congregation.

“People don’t feel comfortable praying next to people who carry arms,” he said.

He questioned if Sen. Black spoke with faith leaders before introducing the bill. 

“I can tell you from the Muslim community perspective … we don’t want that [the bill],” Damaj said.

Just before the Senate approved the bill on Jan. 24, Black said that congregation members are “vulnerable” and “the ultimate target” of someone who intends to inflict “mayhem on the congregation.” He pointed to church shootings in recent years, including a 2015 mass shooting in Charleston, South Carolina by a white supremacist who killed nine black churchgoers during a Bible study service. 

“You cower in place or you fight back,” Black said. 

Black did not respond to requests for a comment on the legislation. 

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.
0
0
0
0
0

(3) comments

Louf

That's another reason not to go to church. I for one do not like being the "lamb" for the slaughter. When you advertise gun free zones you are inviting disaster.

debellemily

I absolutely believe having guns in church is ethically wrong and goes against everything a church stands for. Firstly, I appreciate your objective approach to providing facts of the situation, along with the order of fact presentation. I did not sense any sort of bias; but if anything, I would guess that it is agreed upon that guns do not belong in places of worship. In today’s modern society, I, as do many others, feel strongly about the presence of guns in public places. Over the last couple years gun violence has been one of the most frequent highlights in the media, naturally causing people to hold strong opinions about such a topic. I am concerned for my safety far more than I feel is normal, as there have been shootings and other violent acts involving weapons at common places like movie theatres, the streets, restaurants, parking lots, workplaces and the most alarming; schools. As a first-year college student I am familiar with how it feels to be afraid to go to school because of the possibility of something harmful happening. As a matter of fact, there was an incident where a former classmate of mine who no longer attended my school posted pictures with his guns, and then posted a picture of him at my school. Out of my fear, I reported him and the entire school went on lockdown for a presumably false alarm. I was embarrassed, yet also relieved to know that I took action. The point of this story is to convey that I already know how it is to feel unsafe and unsettled in a place that is supposed to be associated with positivity and growth. Churches are people’s place to feel free from the chaos of the outside world on a very deep and personal level. By inviting guns into churches, that is diminishing the association between peace and safety, in yet another “safe place”. The scariest part of this all is that spiritual security is the foundation of some people’s lives, including myself, and taking that away from us would be detrimental to our well-being and daily functioning, leading to feelings of disparity and hopelessness. In addition, having guns in a safe place is only encouraging/challenging violent people to perform violent acts. Guns and violence should absolutely have no part in a place of respite, peace and security. I am beyond grateful the bill was rejected.

Silas2ndAmendment

Who are the idiots in the house that do not want to allow citizens to protect them selves. Having a permit allows us to use the constitution to protect our family.
Idiot political leaders think everyone with a gun is a bad person. That is NOT true.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.