Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.

Principals – not police – would handle minor offenses in schools, under proposed changes to the SRO program

  • Updated
  • 3
school bus generic

A proposed new agreement between Prince William County’s school division and county police department aims to reduce children’s exposure to the criminal justice system 

The school division released a newly revised “memorandum of understanding,” the agreement that governs the police officers’ role in the county’s public schools, last week. The document directs school administrators – not school resource officers – to handle low-level criminal offenses committed by children in schools.  

“It is the goal of the [police department] and the PWCS that children are not unnecessarily exposed to the criminal justice system. Therefore, it shall be agreed that all minor criminal behavior committed by a child in the school setting will be handled by PWCS administration,” the memorandum states.  

The memorandum outlines the rules, training and procedures that school resource officers, sworn police officers assigned to work in middle and high schools, must follow. Public comment on the document can be submitted on the school division’s website until Thursday, Dec. 30.  

Prince William County Schools Superintendent LaTanya McDade sent an email to parents last Friday stating her support for the updated memorandum. McDade said the new rules “will help clarify the role of SROs in our schools and include new training and screening requirements – all with the aim of bolstering student and staff safety.” 

An overhaul of the school division’s school resource officer rules by the school division and police department began earlier this year. 

Prince William County Police Chief Peter Newsham said in September that the revisions would likely include new rules ensuring school resource officers do not arrest students for “minor offenses,” such as thefts and disorderly conduct. 

“These are the types of things that can get our students unnecessarily involved in the criminal justice system... I think collectively, we want to get away from that,” Newsham said at the time. 

The revision to the memorandum comes at a time when parents are increasingly concerned about a perceived uptick school fights in local schools. During a recent meeting of the school division’s Safe Schools Advisory Council, however, school officials said there has not been an uptick in fights when incidents are compared on an annual basis. McDade recommended that data be broken down by quarter to better assess whether there have been more fights at the start of this school year compared to previous years.

The revised memorandum continues to allow SROs to interview students without prior parental consent if they are investigating a school-related incident that could have potential safety consequences for students and employees, including student fights that may result in retaliation, threats against students or employees, gang-related offenses or drug or weapon possession.

At the state and local level, the debate over whether to remove police officers from schools throughout Virginia has been an ongoing conversation. School boards in Arlington County and the City of Alexandria both voted to remove police officers from their schools entirely earlier this year. Alexandria has since decided to return them to schools. 

In Prince William County, the local NAACP has advocated for the removal of school resource officers from county schools entirely. 

At the state level, the Virginia General Assembly enacted several new laws in 2020 aimed at closing the “school-to-prison pipeline.”

A new law banned disorderly conduct charges from being levied against Virginia students during school, on buses or at school-sponsored events. Another law removed a requirement that school principals report student acts that constitute a misdemeanor to law enforcement. 

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.

2020 was a year marked by hardships and challenges, but the Prince William community has proven resilient. The Prince William Times is honored to serve as your community companion. To say thank you for your continued support, we’d like to offer all our subscribers -- new or returning --


We understand the importance of working to keep our community strong and connected. As we move forward together into 2021, it will take commitment, communication, creativity, and a strong connection with those who are most affected by the stories we cover.

We are dedicated to providing the reliable, local journalism you have come to expect. We are committed to serving you with renewed energy and growing resources. Let the Prince William Times be your community companion throughout 2021, and for many years to come.


Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(3) comments

John Smith

Oooh goodie! We're going to get sent to the principal's office for assaults, drug use, theft, and harassment. So scary! Of course, we can't have police handle these "minor" crimes, because heaven forbid children and teens learn that actions have consequences. We can't oppress them with an unjust criminal justice system, because of course the criminals are all really just victims themselves!


Another indication of someone not reading the article and spouting their typical nonsense, hiding behind a fake persona in order to not be held accountable for their actions.

This counters “xxKYLORDxx” (must be a regular participant in the prison system):

“The revised memorandum continues to allow SROs to interview students without prior parental consent if they are investigating a school-related incident that could have potential safety consequences for students and employees, including student fights that may result in retaliation, threats against students or employees, gang-related offenses or drug or weapon possession.“

John Smith

Hey buddy, I'm a real person and I live in Northern Prince William. I also read the article, so save your "it's a Russian bot" or "he's hiding on purpose" nonsense for somewhere else. I work in the IT industry and know how much personal info is plastered all over the regular internet and darknet, so no I'm not going to shout my personal info from the rooftops. I'd highly recommend you engage in a little bit more discrete anonymity online yourself. Take that or leave that.

The key point you quoted in the article highlights just the concern, that school administrators can WITHOUT PRIOR PARENTAL APPROVAL grill and interrogate students about their "incidents". Children have never, nor will ever belong to State. It's a parent's right to know EVERYTHING their student is or isn't involved with as far as school administration goes. This is the exact kind of bureaucratic nonsense pushed by school boards that parents are fighting back against around the entire country.

So again, I read the article but think a policy like this is highly well intentioned, but comprehensively naive, misguided, and premised on a false notion that people are inherently good by nature and just need more "understanding" when they commit civil or criminal crimes.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Page Title

The future of Prince William Times now depends on community support. Your donation will help us continue to improve our journalism through in-depth local news coverage and expanded reader engagement.

Keeping you connected to the Community. Find or Submit your local event here..

Sign Up For Newsletters